Full text
Ferrara v. Barnett
Case: 24-50303 Document: 21-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-50303 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ August 15, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce John D. Ferrara, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
Jeffrey Blake Barnett, Police Chief for the City of Kyle; City of Kyle,
Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:21-CV-237 ______________________________
Before Jolly, Jones, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * John Ferrara, pro se, appeals the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion for relief from final judgment in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit. We AFFIRM. This lawsuit is one of at least five filed by Ferrara in which he alleged the City of Kyle, Texas, and its police chief illegally arrested him and violated
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
— 2 —
Case: 24-50303 Document: 21-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2024
No. 24-50303
his civil rights. The district court dismissed this lawsuit as frivolous and malicious, considering its claims are duplicative of those Ferrara raised in an earlier lawsuit, which the district court dismissed. Ferrara then filed two motions for relief from the final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), which the district court denied. Ferrara now appeals only the denial of that second post-judgment motion. We review for abuse of discretion. See Bailey v. Cain, 609 F.3d 763, 767 (5th Cir. 2010). Ferrara, however, only briefed challenges to the dismissal of the underlying lawsuit, not the denial of the motion subject to this appeal. Ferrara fails to argue that the district court abused its discretion in denying that motion, so he has abandoned the issue he seeks to appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Consequently, the denial of Ferrara’s motion for relief from the final judgment by the district court is, therefore, in all respects, AFFIRMED.