Full text
Robert Stanley PLIMPTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Evelyn COOPER; David Francis; Jack Horton; Mary Ann Enloe; Jim Stevens; Haywood County; C. Tom Alexander, III; Bobby Suttles; Dean Henline, Officially and Individually Private Capacities; Steven J. Bryant; J. Marlene Hyatt, Judge; Charles W. Hipps, Defendants-Appellees
PER CURIAM.
Robert Plimpton appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing as frivolous his three civil actions and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion and orders discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Plimpton v. Cooper, 141 F.Supp.2d 573 (W.D.N.C.2001). We deny Plimpton’s motion for production of documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma *160 terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.