State v. S. N. O.

Submitted March 5, reversed April 7, 2021

In the Matter of S. N. O., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. S. N. O., Appellant. Deschutes County Circuit Court 20CC05089; A174593 484 P3d 1131

Alison M. Emerson, Judge. Joseph R. DeBin and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Adam Holbrook, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed.

584 State v. S. N. O.

PER CURIAM Appellant appeals a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days and an order prohibiting her from pur- chasing or possessing firearms. ORS 426.130. She contends that the trial court committed plain error when it failed to advise her pursuant to ORS 426.100(1) of all of the possible outcomes of the proceeding. The state concedes the error. We agree and accept the concession. Failure to provide such statutory advice of rights constitutes plain error. See gen- erally State v. J. R. B., 290 Or App 858, 862, 418 P3d 38 (2018) (citing cases concluding such error was plain error). Given the nature of civil commitment proceedings, the rela- tive interests of the parties, the gravity of the error, and the ends of justice, we exercise discretion to correct the error. Reversed.