Ward v. The Clarendon County Planning and Public Service Commission

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Ray Ward, Appellant, v. The Clarendon County Planning and Public Service Commission, Respondents. Appeal From Clarendon County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-398 Submitted June 1, 2005 – Filed June 23, 2005 AFFIRMED William Ceth Land, of Manning, for Appellant. Ralph F. Cothran, of Manning, for Respondents. PER CURIAM: Ray Ward filed this action in circuit court, appealing a decision of the Clarendon County Planning and Public Service Commission. The circuit court affirmed the Commission. Ward appeals. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities: Restaurant Row Assocs. v. Horry County, 335 S.C. 209, 215-16, 516 S.E.2d 442, 446 (1999) (In zoning cases, a court will refrain from substituting its judgment for that of the reviewing body.); Historic Charleston Found. v. Krawcheck, 313 S.C. 500, 505-06, 443 S.E.2d 401, 405 (Ct. App. 1994) (A decision of a zoning body will not be disturbed on appeal if there is evidence in the record to support its decision.). AFFIRMED. ANDERSON, STILWELL, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur. [1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.