Full text
Molina v. Venchi 2, LLC
Molina v Venchi 2, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 33556(U) October 3, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 505745/2019 Judge: Wayne Saitta Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/07/2024 10:03 AM INDEX NO. 505745/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 248 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2024
At an IAS Term, Part 29 of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings, at the Courthouse, at Civic Center, Brooklyn, New York, on the 3rd day of October 2024.
P R E S E N T:
HON. WAYNE SAITTA, Justice. ------------------------------------------------------------X EDUARDO MOLINA,
Plaintiff, Index No. 505745/2019
-against- MS #5 & MS #7 & MS #8
Order VENCHI 2, LLC, CENTRAL AREA EQUITIES ASSOCIATES, LLC., TRANSWORLD EQUITIES, INC., and EMPIRE RESTORATION CONSULTING CORP.,
Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------X VENCHI 2, LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff
-against-
EMPIRE RESTORATION CONSULTING CORP.,
Third-Party Defendant
--------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following papers read on this motion: NYSCEF Doc Nos Notice of Motion/Order to Show Cause/ Petition/Affidavits (Affirmations) and Exhibits 116-132, 172-183, 191-207, 220 Cross-motions Affidavits (Affirmations) and Exhibits Answering Affidavit (Affirmation) 155-171, 208-211, 222-232, 233-238 Reply Affidavit (Affirmation) 212-216, 239-245 Supplemental Affidavit (Affirmation) _____________
It is ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on his claim
pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1) is Denied. The affidavit of Jaime Cebada Meza in which
1 of 5 [* 1]
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/07/2024 10:03 AM INDEX NO. 505745/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 248 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2024
he states that Plaintiff fell from a ladder that he placed on top of the scaffold and leaned
against the wall, and that he and his co-employees told him not to do so, contradicts
Plaintiff’s testimony that the scaffold collapsed and is sufficient to raise a question of fact
as to whether there was a violation of Labor Law § 240(1). Plaintiff’s reliance on Jimenez
v. RC Church of Epiphany, 85 AD3d 974 [2d Dept 2011], is misplaced. In that case,
Plaintiff was instructed by his supervisors to place the ladder on top of the scaffold. The
fact that Meza’s name and address were not disclosed to Plaintiff despite a demand does
not preclude considering his affidavit in opposition to a motion for summary judgment.
Whether Meza is permitted to testify at trial is a matter for the trial judge. Also, the
deposition testimony of Thomasz Fryc was that he viewed the scaffold on the day after the
accident and that it was intact contradicts Plaintiff’s claim that the scaffold collapsed; and
it is further,
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendants CENTRAL AREA
EQUITIES ASSOCIATES, LLC., and TRANSWORLD EQUITIES, INC., for summary
judgment dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against them pursuant to Labor Law § 200 is
Granted. The accident involved the means and methods of construction rather than a
dangerous condition at the premises and Defendants CENTRAL and TRANSWORLD did
not supervise or control Plaintiff’s work; and it is further,
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendants CENTRAL AREA
EQUITIES ASSOCIATES, LLC., and TRANSWORLD EQUITIES, INC., for summary
judgment on their claims against Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for contractual
indemnification is Denied, as the indemnification provision in the lease only requires
VENCHI 2 LLC to indemnify them to the extent that they are not reimbursed by insurance
and it is undetermined at this point whether Defendant CENTRAL’s insurer will
reimburse them for Plaintiff’s claims; and it is further 2
2 of 5 [* 2]
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/07/2024 10:03 AM INDEX NO. 505745/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 248 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2024
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendants CENTRAL AREA
EQUITIES ASSOCIATES, LLC., and TRANSWORLD EQUITIES, INC., for summary
judgment on their claims against Defendant EMPIRE RESTORATION CONSULTING
CORP. for contractual indemnification is Denied. There is no contract between CENTRAL
and EMPIRE, and the contract between EMPIRE and VENCHI required EMPIRE to
indemnify the owner of the property. There is a question of fact whether Defendant
CENTRAL AREA EQUITIES ASSOCIATES, LLC., or TRANSWORLD EQUITIES, INC. is
the owner of the property as the deed is in the name of a different, albeit similarly named,
entity.
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendants CENTRAL AREA
EQUITIES ASSOCIATES, LLC., and TRANSWORLD EQUITIES, INC., for summary
judgment on their claims against Defendant EMPIRE RESTORATION CONSULTING
CORP. for common law indemnification is Denied. Movant has not demonstrated that
EMPIRE was negligent; and it is further,
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for
summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against it pursuant to Labor Law § 241(6)
is Denied. Movant did not address Plaintiff’s claims based on Industrial Code section 23-
5.1 through 23-5.7 in its original moving papers. It would be improper to consider
movants arguments as to those sections raised first in reply as Plaintiff has not had an
opportunity to respond to them; and it is further,
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for
summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against it pursuant to Labor Law § 200
is Granted. The accident involved the means and methods of construction rather than a
dangerous condition at the premises and VENCHI 2 LLC did not supervise or control
Plaintiff’s work; and it is further, 3
3 of 5 [* 3]
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/07/2024 10:03 AM INDEX NO. 505745/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 248 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2024
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for
summary judgment on its claims against Defendant EMPIRE RESTORATION
CONSULTING CORP. for common law indemnification is Denied. There are questions of
fact whether Defendant EMPIRE was negligent; and it is further,
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for
summary judgment on its claims against Defendant EMPIRE RESTORATION
CONSULTING CORP. for contractual indemnification is Denied. There were two
indemnification provisions submitted, one which was limited to Defendant EMPIRE’s
negligence and the other which covered liability arising out of or in connection to the
performance of the work, and did not depend on EMPIRE being negligent. The
indemnification provision which did not depend on EMPIRE being negligent was not
signed or authenticated. Thus, there are questions of fact as to which indemnification
provision governed and whether EMPIRE was negligent; and it is further,
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for
summary judgment on its claims against Defendant EMPIRE RESTORATION
CONSULTING CORP. for breach of contract for failure to procure insurance is Denied.
There were two insurance provisions submitted, one which only required Defendant
EMPIRE to obtain insurance and the other which required EPMIRE to obtain insurance
coverage for VENCHI. EMPIRE did procure insurance for itself although that coverage is
being challenged. The insurance provision which required EMPIRE to provide insurance
for VENCHI was not signed or authenticated. Thus, there are questions of fact as to which
insurance provision governed; and it is further,
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for
summary judgment dismissing Defendant CENTRAL AREA EQUITIES ASSOCIATES,
LLC.’s claims against it for common law indemnification is Granted. The accident 4
4 of 5 [* 4]
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/07/2024 10:03 AM INDEX NO. 505745/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 248 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2024
involved the means and methods of construction rather than a dangerous condition at the
premises and Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC did not supervise or control Plaintiff’s work; and
it is further,
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for
summary judgment dismissing Defendant CENTRAL AREA EQUITIES ASSOCIATES,
LLC.’s claims against it for contractual indemnification is Denied. The indemnification
provision in Defendant VENCHI’s lease only requires VENCHI to indemnify CENTRAL
to the extent that it is not reimbursed by insurance and it is undetermined at this point
whether CENTRAL’s insurer will reimburse them for Plaintiff’s claims; and it is further
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for
summary judgment dismissing Defendant CENTRAL AREA EQUITIES ASSOCIATES,
LLC.’s claims against it for failure to procure insurance is Denied. Movant did not set forth
a basis to grant summary judgment as to this clam in it moving papers; and it is further,
ORDERED, that that portion of the motion of Defendant VENCHI 2 LLC for
summary judgment dismissing Defendant EMPIRE RESTORATION CONSULTING
CORP.’s claims against it for contractual indemnification and failure to procure insurance
is Granted. Defendant VENCHI’s contract with EMPIRE did not require VENCHI to
indemnify EMPIRE or procure insurance for EMPIRE.
E N T E R:
JSC
5 of 5 [* 5]