In the Matter of Frank Saunders

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Frank Saunders, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002005

Appeal From Dorchester County Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-286 Submitted June 1, 2018 – Filed June 27, 2018

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: York v. Conway Ford, Inc., 325 S.C. 170, 173, 480 S.E.2d 726, 728 (1997) ("The record should include the ruling on appeal."); id. ("An objection made during an off-the-record conference which is not made part of the record does not preserve the question for review." (emphasis added)); In re Richard D., 388 S.C. 95, 100, 693 S.E.2d 447, 450 (Ct. App. 2010) (providing that although an issue may have been discussed during an off-the-record bench conference, an

appellate court "cannot review issues not contained in the record"); see also State v. Simpson, 325 S.C. 37, 42, 479 S.E.2d 57, 60 (1996) ("Unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling made, the issue is not preserved for review." (emphasis added)).

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.