Dr. X v. SC Department of Corrections

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Dr. X, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent. Appeal From Richland County J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-183 Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed March 2, 2010 APPEAL DISMISSED Dr. X, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu X, of Ridgeville, for Appellant. Robert Wesley Jacobs, of Lexington, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dr. X appeals the circuit court's dismissal of his appeal from the Administrative Law Court (ALC), arguing: (1) the South Carolina Department of Corrections disobeyed our supreme court's order requiring judicial review of his appeal; (2) the loss of the original record on appeal precludes meaningful appellate review; and (3) the circuit court and ALC erred in denying his summary judgment motions. We dismiss[1] Dr. X's appeal pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Slezak v. S.C. Dep't of Corrs., 361 S.C. 327, 331, 605 S.E.2d 506, 507 (2004) (recognizing an appellate court lacks appellate jurisdiction over an administrative or non-collateral matter until entry of a final agency decision). APPEAL DISMISSED. PIEPER and GEATHERS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur. [1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.