In The Matter of The Care and Treatment of Darrell Jackson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In The Matter of The Care and Treatment of Darrell Jackson, Appellant. Appeal From Florence County Judge Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-262 Submitted April 1, 2010 – Filed April 29, 2010 AFFIRMED Appellate Defender Lanelle C. Durant, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Darrell Jackson appeals his commitment to the South Carolina Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Forrester, 343 S.C. 637, 642, 541 S.E.2d 837, 840 (2001) (holding a motion in limine to exclude evidence made at the beginning of trial does not generally preserve the issue for appellate review because a motion in limine is not a final determination); State v. Floyd, 295 S.C. 518, 520, 369 S.E.2d 842, 843 (1988) ("A ruling on the motion is not the ultimate disposition on the admissibility of evidence. It remains subject to change based upon developments during trial."). AFFIRMED. SHORT, WILLIAMS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. [1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.