In The Interest of Thomas H.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In The Interest of Thomas H., A Minor Under The Age of Seventeen, Appellant. Appeal From Lancaster County Roger E. Henderson, Family Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-248 Submitted April 1, 2010 – Filed April 21, 2010 affirmed Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Thomas H. appeals his commitment to the Department of Juvenile Justice for an indeterminate period, not to exceed his twenty-first birthday, for violating his probation for truancy and pleading guilty to assault of a high and aggravated nature. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Shumate, 276 S.C. 46, 46-47, 275 S.E.2d 288, 288 (1981) (finding a defendant is precluded from challenging the authority of the trial court to revoke his probationary sentence, previously imposed and admittedly violated, by failing to object to or seek modification of the revocation sentence in the trial court); In re Arisha K.S., 331 S.C. 288, 296, 501 S.E.2d 128, 133 (Ct. App. 1998) (noting juvenile defendants must contemporaneously object to the voluntariness of a guilty plea in order to preserve the issue on appeal). Affirmed. PIEPER and GEATHERS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur. [1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.