In the Interest of Ryan E.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In the Interest of Ryan E., a Minor Under the Age of Seventeen, Appellant. Appeal From Greenville County Letitia H. Verdin, Family Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-086 Submitted February 1, 2012 – Filed February 22, 2012 APPEAL DISMISSED Appellate Defender Elizabeth Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Ryan E. appeals a family court order determining that the issue of whether or not to place him on the sex offender registry would be reserved for a hearing upon his release from confinement at the Department of Juvenile Justice. We dismiss[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: Tracy v. Tracy, 384 S.C. 91, 99, 682 S.E.2d 14, 18 (Ct. App. 2009) ("Before any action can be maintained, a justiciable controversy must be present. A justiciable controversy is a real and substantial controversy which is ripe and appropriate for judicial determination, as distinguished from a contingent, hypothetical or abstract dispute." (internal citations omitted)). APPEAL DISMISSED. FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur. [1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.