City of Rock Hill v. Garga-Richardson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE, IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals City of Rock Hill, Respondent, v. Alieo Garga-Richardson, Appellant. Appeal from York County John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-612 Submitted November 3, 2008 – Filed November 10, 2008 AFFIRMED Alieo C. Garga-Richardson, pro se, for Appellant. Christopher Edward Barton, of Rock Hill, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Alieo C. Garga-Richardson appeals the circuit court’s dismissal of his appeal from the municipal court. We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: S.C. Code Ann. § 14-25-95 (Supp. 2007) (requiring an appellant to set forth the grounds for appeal in his notice of appeal from the municipal court); S.C. Code Ann. § 14-25-105 (Supp. 2007) (providing the circuit court does not conduct a de novo review in criminal appeals from municipal court); City of Rock Hill v. Suchenski, 374 S.C. 12, 15, 646 S.E.2d 879, 880 (2007) (holding in criminal appeals from the municipal court, the appellate court reviews errors of law only). AFFIRMED. HEARN, C.J., SHORT and KONDUROS, JJ., concur. [1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.