Opinion

United States v. Malcolm

282 U.S. 792 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 19, 1931

Full text

Opinions in this case

Opinion — Per curiam
Majority — Pee

282 U.S. 792 (1931) UNITED STATES v. MALCOLM. No. 512. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 12, 1931. Decided January 19, 1931. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *794 Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, Mr. Sewall Key and Miss Helen R. Carloss, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold submitted for the United States. Messrs. Kingman Brewster, James S.Y. Ivins, Allen G. Wright, A.J. Hill, O.R. Folsom-Jones, Joseph D. Brady, and F.E. Youngman submitted for Malcolm. PER CURIAM. The first question certified is answered: No. The second question is answered: Yes. Poe v. Seaborn, ante, p. 101; Goodell v. Koch, ante, p. 118; Hopkins v. Bacon, ante, p. 122.

U.S. Tax Court · Oct 14, 2020

Gleason v. Comm'r

U.S. Tax Court · Jun 29, 2011

In Re Marriage of Knowles

California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 2009

Anastasi v. Knowles

California Court of Appeal · Oct 6, 2009

Ali v. Comm'r

U.S. Tax Court · Dec 27, 2004

Webb v. Commissioner

U.S. Tax Court · Dec 19, 1996

Vincent v. Commissioner

U.S. Tax Court · Jul 26, 1994

Dooley v. Commissioner

U.S. Tax Court · Jan 21, 1992

McPherson v. Commissioner

U.S. Tax Court · Oct 21, 1991

Congelliere v. Commissioner

U.S. Tax Court · May 30, 1990

Stewart v. Commissioner

U.S. Tax Court · May 30, 1990

Healy v. Commissioner

U.S. Tax Court · Jul 26, 1989

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.