Bungie Inc v. Elite Boss Tech Incorporated

[8] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE [10] 11 BUNGIE, INC., CASE NO. 2:21-cv-01112-TL 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. [13] ELITE BOSS TECH, INC., et al., [14] Defendants. [16] 17 This matter is before the Court sua sponte. On September 20, 2023, Plaintiff Bungie, Inc., 18 filed notice of voluntary dismissal of all Doe defendants. See Dkt. No. 89. On the same day, 19 Plaintiff filed a status report. See Dkt. No. 90. Plaintiff states that it “will proceed against the 20 remaining named defendants, all of whom are believed to reside outside of the United States.” Id. 21 at 1. Plaintiff further states that “[i]nvestigative efforts to obtain addresses” for those defendants 22 is “ongoing” and “[s]ignificant progress has been made,” but that it “is taking considerable time 23 and effort” to obtain the addresses. Id. at 1–2. [24] 1 While a plaintiff must generally serve a defendant within 90 days of filing a complaint, 2 that time limit does not apply to service on a foreign defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) 3 (exempting “service in a foreign country” from the 90-day deadline); Lucas v. Natoli, 936 F.2d 4 432, 432 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (holding the same). But a plaintiff does not have “an 5 unlimited time” for service of process in a foreign country, and the Court may set a reasonable 6 time limit to accomplish such service. See, e.g., Inst. of Cetacean Rsch. v. Sea Shepherd 7 Conservation Soc’y, 153 F. Supp. 3d 1291, 1320 (W.D. Wash. 2015) (expressing concerns about 8 failure to serve foreign party and setting a deadline for such service). 9 On May 25, 2023, Plaintiff requested that any deadline for service “not be until at least 10 the end of the year, as it may take that long for Hague Convention service.” Dkt. No. 82 at 6; see 11 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1) (authorizing service “by any internationally agreed means of service that 12 is reasonably calculated to give notice”); Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk, 486 13 U.S. 694 , 699 (1988) (holding Hague Convention mandatory in all cases to which it applies). 14 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a status report detailing its efforts at service or, 15 if appropriate, a motion for alternative service by January 31, 2024. 16 Dated this 21st day of September 2023. [17] A [18] Tana Lin United States District Judge