Belander v. Pedro

— 1 — — 2 — — 3 — — 4 — — 5 — UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT — 6 — WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA — 7 — 8 DAMIAN BELANDER, CASE NO. 3:23-CV-6132-BHS-DWC 9 Petitioner, ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT AND FOR SERVICE 10 v. OF AND ANSWER TO § 2254 PETITION 11 COREY FUHURE, 12 Respondent. — 13 — 14 This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . The Court, having reviewed 15 Petitioner’s Federal Habeas Petition (Dkt. 1), hereby finds and ORDERS as follows: 16 (1) Substitution of Respondent 17 Petitioner named Corey Fuhure as Respondent. Dkt. 1. However, the proper respondent 18 to a habeas petition is the “person who has custody over [the petitioner].” 28 U.S.C. § 2242 ; see 19 also § 2243; Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1992); Dunne v. Henman, 875 20 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Eastern Oregon 21 Correctional Institution (“EOCI”) and the superintendent of that facility is David Pedro. 22 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to substitute David Pedro as the Respondent in this 23 action. The Clerk is also directed to update the case title. ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE 1 (2) Service 2 The Clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon Respondent and upon the 3 Attorney General of the State of Washington, of copies of: the Petition, any other documents 4 filed in support of the Petition, the Notice of Consent, and this Order. The Clerk shall also direct 5 a copy of this Order and of the Court’s pro se instruction sheet to Petitioner. 6 Within forty-five (45) days after such service, Respondent shall file and serve an answer 7 in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States District 8 Courts. As part of such answer, Respondent shall state whether the Petition is time barred, 9 whether Petitioner has exhausted available state remedies, and whether an evidentiary hearing is 10 necessary. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first 11 showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the 12 Clerk of the Court and serve a copy of the answer on Petitioner. 13 (3) The answer will be treated in accordance with LCR 7. Accordingly, on the face of 14 the answer, Respondent shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after filing. Petitioner 15 may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the Friday 16 designated for consideration of the matter, and Respondent may file and serve a reply not later 17 than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter. 18 (4) Filing by Parties, Generally 19 All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents 20 electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. All non-attorneys, such as pro se parties and/or 21 prisoners, may continue to file a paper original with the Clerk. All filings, whether filed 22 electronically or in traditional paper format, must indicate in the upper right-hand corner the 23 name of the United States Magistrate Judge to whom the document is directed. ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE 1 For any party filing electronically, when the total of all pages of a filing exceeds fifty 2 (50) pages in length, a paper copy of the document (with tabs or other organizing aids as 3 necessary) shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office for chambers. The chambers copy must be 4 clearly marked with the words “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing for Chambers.” 5 Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served 6 upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. 7 (5) Motions 8 Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. 9 Pursuant to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a 10 part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption 11 (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for 12 consideration on the Court’s motion calendar. 13 (6) Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge 14 No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with 15 regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk. 16 Dated this 10th day of January, 2024. — 17 — A — 18 — David W. Christel 19 Chief United States Magistrate Judge — 20 — — 21 — — 22 — — 23 — ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE