Lockhart v. Hibma

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JERMAINE LOCKHART, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-CV-1355-JPS-JPS C.O. BRITTANY HIBMA, ORDER Defendant. On September 11, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee (“IPFF”) of $1.53. (Docket #6). On September 21, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration (Docket #7) that appears to be a motion seeking the Court’s permission to use his release account to pay the IPFF. The Court will treat it as such. This Court has the authority to order disbursements from a prisoner’s release account for payment of an IPFF. See, e.g., Doty v. Doyle, 182 F. Supp. 2d 750, 751 (E.D. Wis. 2002) (noting that “both the Wisconsin Prison Litigation Reform Act…and the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act [(“PLRA”)]…authorize the courts to order that…a prisoner’s release account be made available [to pay an IPFF]”). However, this Court lacks the authority—statutory or otherwise—to order that a prisoner may tap into his release account to pay current (or future) litigation costs. Cf. Wilson v. Anderson, No. 14-CV-0798, 2014 WL 3671878 , at *3 (E.D. Wis. July 23, 2014) (declining to order that a prisoner’s full filing fee be paid from his release account, “[g]iven the [DOC’s] rationale for segregating funds into a release account” and the absence of any statutory authority compelling the court to do so). Permitting a prisoner to invade a release account for litigation costs could harm that prisoner’s likelihood of success post-incarceration, see Wis. Admin. Code. § DOC 309.466 (stating that disbursements from a prisoner’s release account are authorized “for purposes that will aid the inmate’s reintegration into the community”), especially if the prisoner is particularly litigious. As the Seventh Circuit has instructed, “like any other civil litigant, [a prisoner] must decide which of [his] legal actions is important enough to fund,” Lindell v. McCallum, 352 F.3d 1107, 1111 (7th Cir. 2003); thus, if a prisoner concludes that “the limitations on his funds prevent him from prosecuting [a] case with the full vigor he wishes to prosecute it, he is free to choose to dismiss it voluntarily and bring it at a later date.” Williams v. Berge, No. 02-CV-10, 2002 WL 32350026 , at *8 (W.D. Wis. Apr. 30, 2002). While the Court will not permit Plaintiff to tap into his release account for the entirety of his filing fee, or other litigation costs, it will grant Plaintiff permission to use funds from that account solely for the purpose of paying the IPFF. Plaintiff shall ensure that the IPFF of $1.53 is paid to the Clerk of the Court on or before October 15, 2020. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to pay his initial partial filing fee with release account funds (Docket #7) be and the same is hereby GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections or his designee shall release $1.53 from Plaintiff’s release account for payment of the initial partial filing fee in this matter; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall ensure that his initial partial filing fee is paid to the Clerk of the Court on or before October 15, 2020; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of this order be sent to the officer in charge of the agency where Plaintiff is confined. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 24th day of September, 2020. BY T yo — PLY VL Lee 1. P. Stab tmueller 5S. District Judge Page 3 of 3