(HC) Renteria v. Warden, FCI- Herlong

[5] 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [8] 9 DONACIANO ANTONIO RENTERIA, No. 2:24-cv-0826 WBS CKD P 10 Petitioner, 11 v. ORDER 12 WARDEN, F.C.I. HERLONG, 13 Respondent. [14] 15 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 16 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . The matter was referred to a United States 17 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 18 On January 3, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 20 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 21 objections to the findings and recommendations. 22 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452 , 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having 25 reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 26 and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 3, 2025, are adopted in full; 3 2. Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; 4 3. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6) is DENIED as moot; and 5 4. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. 6 | Dated: February 4, 2025 dd Ad “ ak 4 / J 7 WILLIAMB.SHUBB i (its 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE