Connolly v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 5 || Clarissa Connolly, ) No. CV 23-526-TUC-JAS (LCK) 6 Plaintiff, ORDER 7 | Vs. Commissioner of Social Security, ) ° Defendant. 10 ) 11 OO 12 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 13 || Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any 14 || objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 15 || As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed 16 || the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ recommendations are not clearly 17 || erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 18 | 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 19 | 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins 20 || Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24) is accepted and adopted. (2) This case is remanded 21 || back to the ALJ for a new hearing and further proceedings as discussed in the Report and 22 || Recommendation. (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case. 23 || Dated this 13th day of March, 2025. [25] 26 _\ C. Ast > 27 Honorable James A. Soto 28 United States District Judge