Full text
(PS) Alfaro Brittany v. USA Military Inc.
[7] 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
[10] 11 MICHELLA C. ALFARO BRITTANY, Case No. 2:25-cv-00771-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 USA MILITARY INC., 15 Defendant.
[16] 17 Plaintiff proceeds in this civil action without counsel. Accordingly, the matter was 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302. 19 On March 13, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 25 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 26 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 27 the record and by the proper analysis. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 13, 2025, are ADOPTED 3 | IN FULL; 4 2. Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED; and 5 3. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee of $405 within twenty-one days of this Order. 6 | Date: April 17, 2025
[4] |
[9] 10 TROY L. NUNLEY
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
