Full text
Jared Harper v. State of Arkansas
Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 351
Digitally signed by Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2022.07.21 13:45:24 -05'00' No. CR-19-419 Adobe Acrobat version: 2022.001.20169 Opinion Delivered: August 28, 2019
JARED HARPER
APPELLANT MOTION FOR ACCESS TO SEALED
MATERIAL
V.
HONORABLE BRENT HALTOM,
JUDGE
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE MOTION GRANTED
PER CURIAM
Appellant Jared Harper appealed his convictions to our court, and on March 13,
2019, we affirmed two of the three points on appeal and remanded one issue to the circuit
court for further proceedings. See Harper v. State, 2019 Ark. App. 163 , 573 S.W.3d 596 .
Specifically, our court instructed the circuit court on remand to examine the prosecutor’s
notes to determine if the notes were “substantially verbatim” and whether they included
any evidence to which Harper was entitled.
After an in-camera review, the circuit court held that there is “no information that
probably would have changed the outcome of the trial.” However, the material itself
remains under seal, and on July 17, 2019, Harper filed a motion in our court for access to
sealed material. Harper argues that he cannot write an adequate brief without access to the
material. We accordingly grant Harper leave to review the portion of the record under seal
with direction to maintain the confidentiality of the documents pursuant to Arkansas
Supreme Court Administrative Order Number 19.
Motion granted.
