Oknyon Moser v. Pamela Bondi

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1917 Doc: 22 Filed: 04/24/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1917

OKNYON MOSER,

Petitioner,

v.

PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: April 16, 2025 Decided: April 24, 2025

Before AGEE and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oknyon Moser, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Morinelli, General Litigation & Appeals Section, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1917 Doc: 22 Filed: 04/24/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Oknyon Moser, a native and citizen of South Korea, petitions for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) upholding the Immigration Judge’s denial of

her untimely motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Moser’s

claims and conclude that Moser’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the

agency’s disposition. As such, she has forfeited appellate review of the Board’s order. See

Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that

brief.”). To the extent Moser’s arguments may be liberally construed to challenge the

grounds cited by the agency for denying relief, our review discloses no abuse of discretion.

8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(3) (2024); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Moser (B.I.A. Sept. 10, 2024). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED