Full text
United States v. Nedeltcho Vladimirov
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6230 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/23/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6230
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NEDELTCHO VLADIMIROV,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (2:20-cr-00054-1)
Submitted: June 17, 2025 Decided: June 23, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nedeltcho Vladimirov, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 USCA4 Appeal: 25-6230 Doc: 5 Filed: 06/23/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Nedeltcho Vladimirov appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a
sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record
and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Vladimirov’s
motion. See United States v. Centeno-Morales, 90 F.4th 274, 280 (4th Cir. 2024)
(explaining that a district court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily, irrationally,
does not follow statutory or judicially recognized requirements, or commits an error of law
or fact). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Vladimirov,
No. 2:20-cr-00054-1 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 13, 2025). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.