Alabama v. United States

9 L. Ed. 2d 112 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 22, 1962

Full text

Opinions in this case

Opinion — Per curiam
Majority

371 U.S. 37 (1962) ALABAMA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. No. 324. Supreme Court of United States. Decided October 22, 1962. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston, Leslie Hall and Gordon Madison, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for the United States. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Thomas, 362 U. S. 58.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Per Curiam
Cluster ID: 106482

Citations

9 L. Ed. 2d 112
371 U.S. 37
83 S. Ct. 145
1962 U.S. LEXIS 343

Cited by

Holthaus v. Washington Department of Corrections
W.D. Washington · Apr 22, 2025
United States v. Abdumalikov
W.D. Washington · Sep 20, 2024

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

In Re: Khatri Chhetri Sher Bahadur

W.D. Texas · Feb 27, 2020

Fedorov v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1991

Robert LAMS and Robert Franklin, Appellants, v. GENERAL WATERWORKS CORPORATION, Appellee

Eighth Circuit · Aug 16, 1985

NAACP v. City of Corinth

N.D. Mississippi · May 3, 1979

Clark v. Marengo County

S.D. Alabama · Apr 23, 1979

Hopewell v. University of Pittsburgh

W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1978

Randolph v. United States Elevator Corp.

S.D. Florida · Apr 14, 1978

Smith v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Fifth Circuit · Mar 13, 1978

National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

D. Minnesota · Jan 26, 1977

McKenzie v. McCormick

District of Columbia · Jan 12, 1977

Parentheticals

“Mandatory injunctions affirmatively compelling the doing of some act, rather than 14 merely negatively forbidding continuation of a course of conduct, are a traditional tool of 15 equity.”
Holthaus v. Washington Department of Corrections
“Mandatory injunctions affirmatively compelling the doing of some 23 act, rather than merely negatively forbidding continuation of a course of conduct, are a 24 1 traditional tool of equity.”
United States v. Abdumalikov