[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 174 Ohio St.3d 210 .]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MAXCY-TIPTON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Maxcy-Tipton, 2024-Ohio-448 .] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Daniel. (No. 2022-1255―Submitted February 6, 2024―Decided February 13, 2024.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Wood County, No. WD-22-003, 2022-Ohio-3502 . __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Daniel, 173 Ohio St.3d 270 , 2023-Ohio-4035 , 229 N.E.3d 81 . KENNEDY, C.J., and DEWINE, STEWART, and DETERS, JJ., concur. FISCHER and BRUNNER, JJ., concur in judgment only for the reasons set forth in their separate opinions in Daniel. DONNELLY, J., dissents. _________________ Paul A. Dobson, Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and David T. Harold, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Jeffrey P. Nunnari, for appellant, Brooke Marie Maxcy-Tipton. _________________
Loading…