JAMES BARTON v. J. YOUNG, Cpl. STOUT, and DUSTIN BOWERS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JAMES BARTON, Plaintiff, 8:24CV180 vs. ORDER J. YOUNG, in their individual capacities; STOUT, Cpl., in their individual capacities; and DUSTIN BOWERS, in their individual capacities; Defendants. This matter is before the Court for case management. On September 3, 2025, the Court entered a Memorandum and Order, Filing No. 16, authorizing service of process. On September 19, 2025, the summons issued to Defendants J. Young and Cpl. Stout at the address for the Nebraska State Penitentiary were returned unexecuted. Filing No. 21; Filing No. 22. Upon further investigation, it appears neither J. Young nor Cpl. Stout are currently employed by the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to update Defendant J. Young’s name to “Joshua Young.” See Filing No. 6 at 1. 2. The Clerk of Court is further directed to obtain the last known addresses for Defendants Joshua Young and Cpl. Stout from the Marshals Service for service of process on them in their individual capacities. 3. Upon obtaining the necessary addresses, the Clerk of Court is directed to complete and issue summonses for Defendants Joshua Young and Cpl. Stout in their individual capacities at the addresses provided by the Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is further directed to deliver the summonses, the necessary USM-285 Forms, the Complaint, Filing No. 1, its supplements, Filing Nos. 4–8, and a copy of the Court’s September 3, 2025, Memorandum and Order, Filing No. 16, and a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Marshals Service for service of process on Defendants Joshua Young and Cpl. Stout in their individual capacities. Service may be accomplished by certified mail, designated delivery service, or any other authorized method of service. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-508.01 . 1 4. For service by certified mail or designated delivery service, the Marshals Service shall serve Defendants within ten days of the Clerk of the Court issuing and forwarding the summons to the Marshals Service. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-505.01 (1). 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal any document containing the last known personal addresses for Defendants Joshua Young and Cpl. Stout. 6. The United States Marshal shall serve all process in this case without prepayment of fees from Plaintiff. 1 Pro se litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are entitled to rely on service by the United States Marshals Service. Wright v. First Student, Inc., 710 F.3d 782, 783 (8th Cir. 2013). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d), in an in forma pauperis case, “[t]he officers of the court shall issue and serve all process, and perform all duties in such cases.” See Moore v. Jackson, 123 F.3d 1082 , 1085 (8th Cir. 1997) (language in § 1915(d) is compulsory). See, e.g., Beyer v. Pulaski County Jail, 589 Fed. Appx. 798 (8th Cir. 2014) (unpublished) (vacating district court order of dismissal for failure to prosecute and directing district court to order the Marshal to seek defendant’s last-known contact information where plaintiff contended that the Jail would have information for defendant’s whereabouts); Graham v. Satkoski, 51 F.3d 710, 713 (7th Cir. 1995) (when court instructs Marshal to serve papers for prisoner, prisoner need furnish no more than information necessary to identify defendant; Marshal should be able to ascertain defendant’s current address). Dated this 2nd day of October, 2025. BY THE COURT: M. Gerrard nior United States District Judge