Jetchill Ltd v. Shenzhen Jiarui Minghui Trading Co., Ltd and Explonova Store

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 1:25-cv-23377-LEIBOWITZ/LOUIS JETCHILL LTD, Plaintiff, v. SHENZHEN JIARUI MINGHUI TRADING CO., LTD and EXPLONOVA STORE, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS MATTER was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis for a report and recommendation on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 21]. [See ECF No. 34]. After conducting an evidentiary hearing and considering post-hearing briefing, Judge Louis recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion be DENIED. [See ECF Nos. 74, 77, 79, 80, 89]. No objections were filed during the objection period. After careful review of the Report and Recommendation, the Motion, the parties’ papers, the relevant portions of the record, and the governing law, the Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 89]. LEGAL STANDARD After conducting a review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1). If a party files a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact by a magistrate judge, the district court must conduct a de novo review with respect to that factual issue. Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567 , 1576 (11th Cir. 1992). The district court reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2019). To the extent a party fails to object to parts of the magistrate judge’s report, those portions are reviewed for clear error. Macort v. Prem. Inc, 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006) (quoting Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734 , 739 (7th Cir. 1999)). CONCLUSION In the absence of any objection to the R&R, the Court’s own review finds no error. Indeed, the Court thanks Magistrate Judge Louis for her clear, cogent, and thorough R&R; the undersigned fully agrees with its reasoning, findings, and conclusions. Accordingly, itis hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 89] is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED and fully incorporated into this Order for all purposes. 2. Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 21] is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on December 12, 2025. oe UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: counsel of record