Loading…

HORLOCK v. OGLESBY Et Ux. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

HORLOCK v. OGLESBY Et Ux.

390 U.S. 718 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 23, 1968

Full text

Alton Elvardo Horlock v. James Raymond Oglesby Et Ux

Per Curiam. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Per Curiam
Cluster ID: 107667

Citations

390 U.S. 718

Cited by

Adoption of J.R.M. v. Madden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1995

Parentheticals

Statute permitting dispensation with consent of parent to adoption if parent fails to support child for one year was not unconstitutional on due process or equal protections theories as applied to father who was able to support child but did not.
Adoption of J.R.M. v. Madden

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service