Full text
Nicole Romancho v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
[3] 4 Nicole Romancho, No. CV-25-120-TUC-JAS (LCK) 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 Vv. 7 Commissioner of — Social Security Administration, 9 Defendant. 10 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed 12 any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has IS expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. M4 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ 15 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; '6 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734 , 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 18 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 9 (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27) is accepted and 20 adopted. 2! (2) This case is remanded to the ALJ for a new hearing and further proceedings; the 22 Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. 23 Dated this 5th day of January, 2026.
[25] 26 _ \ □ >A 97 Honorable James A. Soto 38 United States District Judge
