Loading…

Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles

89 S. Ct. 926 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 3, 1969

Full text

HOLDEN Et Al. v. ARNEBERGH, CITY ATTORNEY OF LOS ANGELES, Et Al.

Per Curiam. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Per Curiam
Cluster ID: 107867

Citations

89 S. Ct. 926
22 L. Ed. 2d 112
394 U.S. 102
1969 U.S. LEXIS 2377

Cited by

Los Angeles Police Protective League v. Gates
C.D. California · Jan 17, 1984
Alfone v. Sarno
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · May 4, 1979
United States v. Robert Edward Johnson
Fifth Circuit · Mar 20, 1973
United States v. William Marshal Grans
Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 1973
United States v. James Adam Wood
Fourth Circuit · Feb 2, 1972
Grabinger v. Conlisk
N.D. Illinois · Dec 29, 1970
Meyer v. Austin
M.D. Florida · Aug 14, 1970
United States v. Stephen R. Evans
Ninth Circuit · Jun 5, 1970
Miller v. State of California

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1970

United States v. Hosmer

D. Maine · Mar 31, 1970

United States v. Thomas Owen Norman, Jr.

Sixth Circuit · Jul 15, 1969

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.