Garmong v. Silverman, Decaria & Kattleman

Gate National Bank, 85 Nev. 345, 349-50, 455 P.2d 31, 33 (1969), when it determined the reasonableness of SDK's attorney fees. No other aspect of the previous order of affirmance was disturbed in the order granting rehearing. On remand, the district court considered the Brunzell factors, adjudicated the lien, and entered judgment in favor of SDK for $37,439.84. Garmong again appealed. We have considered the parties' arguments and the record in this appeal and conclude that on remand the district court properly followed this court's mandate and did not abuse its discretion when it considered the Brunzell factors and entered judgment in SDK's favor. Argentena Consol. Mining Co. v. Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish, 125 Nev. 527, 531, 216 P.3d 779, 782 (2009) ("[The district court's] attorney fees award is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard."). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

Parraguirre Cherry

1-Garmong's August 20, 2013, motion for leave to file a reply to SDK's response to the notice of supplemental authorities is granted. The clerk of this court shall detach and file the reply attached to Garmong's motion.

We have considered Garmong's other arguments and conclude that they do not warrant reversal.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

cc: Hon. Michael P. Gibbons, District Judge David Wasick, Settlement Judge Carl M. Hebert Woodburn & Wedge Les W. Bradshaw Silverman, Decaria & Kattelman, Chtd. Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Douglas County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A