Loading…

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

McDaniel v. California

3 L. Ed. 2d 299 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 12, 1959

Full text

McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA

Per Curiam. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Frankfurter
Cluster ID: 1087782

Citations

3 L. Ed. 2d 299
358 U.S. 282
79 S. Ct. 323
1959 U.S. LEXIS 1665

Cited by

Ex Parte Casey
Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 22, 2002
Casey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 16, 2001
Gholston v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 16, 1993
United States v. David Swanson
Eleventh Circuit · Nov 22, 1991
State Ex Rel. Sokira v. Burr
Supreme Court of Alabama · May 17, 1991
Johnson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · May 17, 1991
United States v. Swanson
N.D. Alabama · Dec 14, 1990
Sumbry v. State Ex Rel. Grant
Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 23, 1990
Dickerson v. State

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 14, 1986

People v. Trujillo

California Court of Appeal · Apr 25, 1984

Hoskins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 20, 1984

People v. Owens

California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 1980

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

McDaniel v. California — freecase.ai