Loading…

Baby Boy J. v. Johnson — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Baby Boy J. v. Johnson

126 L. Ed. 2d 324 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 27, 1993

Full text

Baby Boy J. v. Johnson

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority

510 U.S. 938 Baby Boy J. v. Johnson et al. No. 93-6232. Supreme Court of United States. October 27, 1993. [1] Appeal from the Sup. Ct. Cal. [2] Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46.2. Reported below: 5 Cal. 4th 84, 851 P. 2d 776.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 114673

Citations

126 L. Ed. 2d 324
510 U.S. 938
114 S. Ct. 374
1993 U.S. LEXIS 6680

Cited by

Jane Doe 2 v. Patrick Shanahan
D.C. Circuit · Mar 8, 2019
Doe v. Mattis
D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 2018
Benton v. State
Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana) · Feb 4, 2011
Cody Troy Dacus v. State
Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso) · Feb 17, 2010
Vives v. City of New York

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

S.D. New York · Nov 24, 2003

D. Utah · Apr 15, 2002

Culliton v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 12, 2001

Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana) · May 3, 2001

Cooper v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 1, 2000

A.H.W. v. G.H.B.

New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Apr 4, 2000

Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Jun 16, 1998

Hernandez v. State

Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio) · Feb 25, 1998

Parentheticals

staying injunction against military personnel policy to the extent the injunction "grant[ed] relief to persons other than [the plaintiff]"
Jane Doe 2 v. Patrick Shanahan
examining intent of parties to gestational carrier arrangement and concluding that genetic parents, a married couple who “intended to procreate a child genetically related to them by the only available means,” were child’s legal parents
Culliton v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
staying injunction, pending appeal, except as applicable to named plaintiff
Able v. United States