Loading…
Opinion
127 L. Ed. 2d 215 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 24, 1994
Full text
Millard Processing Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Opinions in this case
Eighth Circuit · Apr 9, 2004
Eighth Circuit · Dec 9, 2003
Eighth Circuit · Mar 27, 2001
Eighth Circuit · Nov 7, 2000
S.D. Florida · Mar 31, 2000
Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1998
D. New Jersey · Aug 26, 1998
Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1998
D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1998
Parentheticals
recognizing that “it is well established that Congress may impose multiple punishments for a single crime without violating the Constitution’s double jeopardy restrictions”
“the Board will overturn the election when [union] conduct reasonably tended to interfere with the employees’ free and uncoerced choice in the election”
National Labor Relations Board v. Superior of Missouri, Inc.
"Civil and criminal suits, by virtue of our federal system of procedure, must be filed and docketed separately”
court did not cite Austin, and did not decide whether civil forfeiture action under § 881 was punishment because the government employed a single proceeding to prosecute the criminal and civil actions and consequently the Double Jeopardy Clause did not apply
