
Loading…

Loading…
Opinion
152 L. Ed. 2d 145 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 4, 2002
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2018
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Feb 10, 2017
D. Puerto Rico · Sep 8, 2015
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Dec 19, 2014
D. Puerto Rico · Feb 12, 2014
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Aug 30, 2013
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2011
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Nov 5, 2010
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 1, 2010
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Apr 2, 2010
Parentheticals
holding that the trial court's statement in its sentencing order that Ferguson was not "insane" did not show that the trial court applied the standard of insanity to Ferguson's proffered evidence of mitigation
holding that the trial court’s statement in its sentencing order that Ferguson was not ‘insane’ did not show that the trial court applied the standard of insanity to Ferguson’s proffered evidence of mitigation
prosecutor’s argument that the victims also did not have a chance was proper rebuttal to the mitigating evidence that Ferguson did not have a chance because of his difficult childhood and his low intelligence