535 U.S. 906
SYMANTEC CORP.
v.
HILGRAEVE CORP.
No. 01-1140.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 4, 2002.
— 1 —
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 265 F. 3d 1336.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
152 L. Ed. 2d 144 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 4, 2002
N.D. New York · Aug 27, 2004
N.D. Iowa · Aug 12, 2004
Seventh Circuit · Dec 26, 2002
Seventh Circuit · Aug 14, 2002
First Circuit · Jul 29, 2002
Parentheticals
holding that "[t]he plain meaning rule is applicable when the statutory language is clear, unambiguous, and not controlled by other parts of the act or other acts on the same subject."
Dersch Energies, Inc. v. Shell Oil Company and Equilon Enterprises, Inc.
holding that “[t]he plain meaning rule is applicable when the statutory language is clear, unambiguous, and not controlled by other parts of the act or other acts on the same subject.”
Dersch Energies, Inc. v. Shell Oil Company and Equilon Enterprises, Inc.
“an accused device may be found to infringe if it is reasonably capable of satisfying the claim limitations, even though it may also be capable of non-infringing modes of operation”
Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. GlobalSantaFe Corp.