Full text
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. VINCENT ALLEN TREMILLION, Appellant

Loading…
Opinion
111 Or. App. 375 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1992
Full text
STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. VINCENT ALLEN TREMILLION, Appellant
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 14, 2010
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 2007
Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 2006
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2006
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 2005
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1996
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 1995
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 1994
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1994
Parentheticals
holding that error in imposing sentence of 15 to 18 months on one count was harmless given that the sentence was imposed concurrently to a 58-month sentence for another count, because the error could not affect the defendant’s actual period of imprisonment
affirming despite conceded sentencing error where error did not affect period of imprisonment and did not result in any adverse consequences
sentencing error did not require remedial action when it could not affect actual term of imprisonment
affirming, despite conceded sentencing error, when error did not affect period of imprisonment and did not result in any adverse consequences
the existence of a concurrent sentence rendered harmless any error relating to the challenged sentence
no remedial action is required when an erroneous sentence is imposed concurrently with a legally permissible sentence and “cannot affect defendant’s actual period of imprisonment”
sentence of “15 to 18 months’ imprisonment” unlawfully indeterminate
sentence of “15 to 18 months’ imprisonment” unlawfully indeterminate