Opinion

Calhoun v. Patrick

116 Ga. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Sep 12, 1967

Full text

Calhoun v. Patrick

Bell, Presiding Judge. Appellant enumerated error on several grounds, but argued none of them. Thus they were abandoned. Ocmulgee Electric Membership Corp. v. Taylor & Sons, Inc., 115 Ga. App. 44 (5) (153 SE2d 666); Bass v. State, 115 Ga. App. 461 (3) (154 SE2d 770); Zappa v. Higgins, 116 Ga. App. 81 (3) (156 SE2d 521). Appellant did argue, but did not set forth in his enumeration, that the finding of the court, which heard the case without the intervention of a jury, was not authorized by the evidence. Under Sec. 14 of the Appellate Practice Act (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29 as amended by Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243; Code Ann. § 6-810), this court has no jurisdiction to consider grounds which though argued are not enumerated according to that section. Judgment affirmed. Pannell and Whitman, JJ., concur.

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Dec 2, 1982

Dean v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jul 9, 1982

Farmer v. Pressley

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Oct 23, 1979

Cassville-White Associates, Ltd. v. Bartow Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 7, 1979

Marques v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 2, 1979

Hibbert v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jul 3, 1978

Town Finance Corporation v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Mar 6, 1975

Pritchett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Feb 21, 1975

Parentheticals

appellate court has no jurisdiction to consider error argued in brief but not enumerated as error pursuant to former Ga. Code Ann. § 6-810, now codified as OCGA 5-6-40
Complete Wiring Solutions, LLC F/K/A Rutledge & Sons Electric Company, LLC v. Astra Group, Inc.
appellate court has no jurisdiction to consider error argued in brief but not enumerated as error pursuant to former Ga. Code Ann. § 6-810, now codified as OCGA § 5-6-40
Complete Wiring Solutions, LLC v. Astra Group, Inc.