Hodges v. Gay

Townsend, Judge. 1. Special grounds of a motion for new trial complaining that the court failed to charge on certain control *211 ling issues in the case, but which neither set forth in substance any pleadings or evidence raising such issues, nor refer' to and identify-the same by page number in the record, are too incomplete for consideration by this'court. Maxwell v. Hollis, 214 Ga. 358 (104 S. E. 2d 893); Kirby v. Whitlock-Dobbs, Inc., 97 Ga. App. 159 (3) (102 S. E. 2d 631); Brewer v. Henson, 96 Ga. App. 501 (100 S. E. 2d 661); Hartsfield v. Hartsfield, 87 Ga. App. 707 (2) (75 S. E. 2d 276). Decided September 21, 1959. James R. Venable, for plaintiff in error. Zachary & Hunter, W. E. Zachary, John C. Hunter, contra.. 2. The general grounds of the motion for new trial, not being argued or insisted upon, are treated as abandoned. ' ' The trial court did not err in denying the motion for new trial. Judgment affirmed. Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.