Opinion

Parker v. Oklahoma

540 U.S. 978 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 3, 2003

Full text

Parker v. Oklahoma

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Stevens
Cluster ID: 133470

Citations

540 U.S. 978
124 S. Ct. 476

Cited by

Parker v. Allbaugh
Tenth Circuit · Feb 9, 2021
Parker v. Crow
N.D. Oklahoma · May 18, 2020
Parker v. Province
Tenth Circuit · Jan 26, 2011

Parentheticals

“As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a
Parker v. Province
“As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1.”
Parker v. Province