Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Moore

Head, Justice, 1. “The courts of this State have no extra-territorial jurisdiction, and cannot make the citizens of foreign States amenable to their process, or conclude them by a judgment in personam, without their consent.” Dearing v. The Bank of Charleston, 5 Ga. 497 (5) (48 Am. D. 300); City Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Carrugi, 41 Ga. 660; Reynolds & Hamby Estate Mortgage Co. v. Martin, 116 Ga. 495 (42 S. E. 796); Gates v. Shaner, 208 Ga. 454 (1) (67 S. E. 2d 569), and cases cited. 2. “A personal judgment is without any validity, if it be rendered by a State court in an action upon a money-demand against a non-resident of the State, who was served by a publication of summons, but upon whom no personal service of process within the State was made, and who did not appear.” Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714 (2) (24 L. ed. 565); Roller v. Holly, 176 U. S. 398 (20 Sup. Ct. 410, 44 L. ed. 520). 3. “Where the want of jurisdiction over the person is apparent upon the face of the bill, it should be taken advantage of by demurrer.” Kendrick v. Whitfield, 20 Ga. 379 (3); Mullally v. Mullally, 199 Ga. 708, 709 (2) (35 S. E. 2d 199); Gates v. Shaner, supra. Under the foregoing rules, the trial judge properly sustained the demurrers of the nonresident wife. 4. The cases of DeLacy v. Hurst, Purnell & Co., 83 Ga. 223 (9 S. E. 1052); Conley v. Buck, 100 Ga. 187 (28 S. E. 97); Roach v. Terry, 164 Ga. 421 (138 S. E. 902); Keeter v. Bank of Ellijay, 190 Ga. 525, 526 (9 S. E. 2d 761); Edwards v. United Food Brokers, Inc., 195 Ga. 1 (22 S. E. 2d 812); Peoples Loan Co. v. Allen, 199 Ga. 537 (34 S. E. 2d 811); Harper v. Atlanta Milling Co., 203 Ga. 608 (48 S. E. 2d 89); Von Kamp v. Gary, 204 Ga. 875 (52 S. E. 2d 591), and similar cases, cited and relied upon by the petitioner, are not in point on their facts with the present case and do not sustain the petitioner’s contentions. In the above cases the defendants were residents and personally served with process, or the plaintiffs were the holders of judgments and proceeding in rem against property of non-resident defendants. In Reid v. Gordon, 173 Ga. 168 (159 S. E. 708), cited by the petitioner, two Justices dissented and one *688 Justice was absent. If in point on its facts, the Reid case is in conflict with older, full-bench decisions. Submitted April 12, 1955 Decided May 10, 1955 Rehearing denied June 15, 1955. 5. No right to injunction against the resident defendants is shown by the facts alleged. Code § 55-106; Smith v. Manning, 155 Ga. 209 (116 S. E. 813); Keeter v. Bank of Ellijay, supra; Irwin v. Willis, 202 Ga. 463, 464 (2) (43 S. E. 2d 691, 4 A. L. R. 2d 1265). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Wyatt, P. J., absent on account of illness.