Loading…

Forcum v. Illinois — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Forcum v. Illinois

541 U.S. 1078 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 1, 2004

Full text

Forcum v. Illinois

Opinions in this case

Opinion
Majority
Majority

541 U.S. 1078 FORCUM v. ILLINOIS. No. 03-9846. Supreme Court of United States. June 1, 2004. — 1 — App. Ct. Ill., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 344 Ill. App. 3d 427, 800 N. E. 2d 499.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 136757

Citations

541 U.S. 1078
158 L. Ed. 2d 992

Cited by

State v. Wessells
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 29, 2012
State v. Wessells
New Jersey Superior Court App Division · Jul 9, 2009

Parentheticals

holding that, following a six-hour break, law enforcement officials may reinitiate interrogation in the absence of counsel as long as the defendant has had a reasonable opportunity to contact counsel
State v. Wessells

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service