543 U.S. 1005
PARIS
v.
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO.
No. 04-5703.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 29, 2004.
— 1 —
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 94 Fed. Appx. 810.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
160 L. Ed. 2d 466 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 29, 2004
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Apr 2, 2010
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 2, 2009
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 2008
Second Circuit · May 13, 2008
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Aug 31, 2007
W.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2007
Fifth Circuit · May 26, 2006
D. Kansas · Mar 29, 2006
Parentheticals
holding that Key would not have been entitled to relief on his claim that § 13A-5^40(a)(17
“ ‘ “[T]he prosecutor, as well as defense counsel, has a right to present his impressions from the evidence, if reasonable, and may argue every legitimate inference.’” Reeves v. State, 807 So.2d 18, 45 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), quoting Rutledge v. State, 523 So.2d 1087, 1100 (Ala.Crim.App.1987
" ' “[T]estimony that may be inadmissible may be rendered harmless by prior or subsequent lawful testimony to the same effect or from which the same facts can be inferred.” ’ See also Dawson v. State, 675 So.2d 897, 900 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), affirmed, 675 So.2d 905 (Ala.1996