Loading…

Ex Parte Shoe — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Ex Parte Shoe

2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1384 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 10, 2007

Full text

Ex Parte Thomas Franklin SHOE, Appellant

OPINION PER CURIAM. The petition for discretionary review is dismissed as having been improvidently granted. MEYERS, J., not participating.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Meyers
Cluster ID: 1440990

Citations

2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1384
235 S.W.3d 782
2007 WL 2937115

Cited by

Richard King Morris v. State
Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler) · Aug 29, 2014
Tracy Wayne Tow v. State
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Jan 12, 2012
State v. Stewart
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin) · Apr 15, 2009
State v. Trent Stewart
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin) · Apr 15, 2009
DEGADILLO v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 24, 2008
Francisco Degadillo A/K/A Franciso Delgadillo v. State
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Jun 26, 2008

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service