Loading…

Clay v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Clay v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center

161 L. Ed. 2d 1063 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 16, 2005

Full text

Clay v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center

544 U.S. 1035 CLAY v. ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER. No. 04-8018. Supreme Court of United States. May 16, 2005. — 1 — C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 993.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 144646

Citations

161 L. Ed. 2d 1063
544 U.S. 1035
125 S. Ct. 2246
73 U.S.L.W. 3672
2005 U.S. LEXIS 3998

Cited by

Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
M.D. Florida · Mar 28, 2014
Antonia Largaespada v. U.S. Attorney General
Eleventh Circuit · Jan 29, 2013
BARCO v. Tilton
C.D. California · Feb 2, 2010
United States v. Bolden
Eighth Circuit · Nov 4, 2008
Gentry v. Sinclair
W.D. Washington · Sep 15, 2008
Nsou Azondega v. U.S. Attorney General
Eleventh Circuit · Sep 18, 2007
Blanca Cecilia Martinez Quintero v. US Attorney Ge
Eleventh Circuit · Sep 7, 2007
Roberto Federico Segura v. U.S. Attorney General

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Eleventh Circuit · Sep 4, 2007

United States v. Jorge Luis Esquivel-Ortega

Ninth Circuit · May 8, 2007

Hui Wang v. U.S. Attorney General

Eleventh Circuit · May 2, 2007

Dian Chun Jiang v. U.S. Attorney General

Eleventh Circuit · Mar 27, 2007

Ricardo De Jesus De Castro v. U.S. Atty. Gen.

Eleventh Circuit · Mar 22, 2007

Parentheticals

explaining that we “consider only whether there is substantial evidence for the findings made by the BIA, not whether there is substantial evidence for some other finding that could have been ... made”
Michael Malak Shenoda v. U.S. Attorney General
conviction not proved by clear and convincing evidence
Dung Tri Vo v. Gonzales