Shady Grove Orthopedic Assocs. v. Allstate Insurance Co.

07-0141-cv Shady Grove Orthopedic Assocs. v. Allstate Insurance Co.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to summary orders filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the ninth day of June, two thousand and ten.

PRESENT:

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, ROBERT A. KATZMANN , Circuit Judges. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x SHADY GROVE ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES, P.A., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SONIA E. GALVEZ ,

Plaintiff, -v.- No. 07-0141-cv

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY ,

Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT: JOHN S. SPADARO , John Sheehan Spadaro, LLC, Hockessin, DE.

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLEE: ANDREW T. HAHN , SR ., Seyfarth Shaw LLP, New York, NY.

On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment be VACATED and the cause be REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.

After our decision in Shady Grove Orthopedic Assocs., P.A. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 549 F.3d 137 (2008), plaintiffs Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A., petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari and then reversed the decision of this Court. See 556 U.S. — , 2010 WL 1222272 (2010). We now VACATE the judgment of the District Court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

FOR THE COURT, Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court