Opinion

Turner v. Clay

90 S. Ct. 814 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 24, 1970

Full text

Turner v. Clay

Opinions in this case

Opinion — Per curiam
Majority

397 U.S. 39 (1970) TURNER ET AL. v. CLAY ET AL. No. 982. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 24, 1970 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Harry M. Lightsey, Jr., for appellants. Huger Sinkler for Clay et al., and Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Thornton, Secretary of State of South Carolina, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Per Curiam
Cluster ID: 1526665

Citations

90 S. Ct. 814
397 U.S. 39
25 L. Ed. 2d 40
1970 U.S. LEXIS 2934

Cited by

Opinion No. (1996)
Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Jan 11, 1996
Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of Alabama · May 1, 1985
William C. Hall, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. O. Frank Thornton, Secretary of State for the State of South Carolina
Fourth Circuit · Jul 12, 1971
Gordon v. Lance
Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1971
Tiews v. Timberlane Regional School District
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jan 29, 1971
Brenner v. School District of Kansas City, Missouri
W.D. Missouri · Aug 14, 1970

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.