Opinion

In Re Potter

292 B.R. 711 · Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · Oct 8, 2002

Full text

In Re Potter

292 B.R. 711 (2002) In re Potter. Armstrong v. Potter. UT-01-027, 00-21039, 00-2089. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Tenth Circuit. October 8, 2002. Affirmed in part; Dismissed in part.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 1527640

Citations

292 B.R. 711
2002 WL 31802978

Cited by

Akhlaghpour v. Orantes
California Court of Appeal · Dec 13, 2022
Tanner Scott Campbell
District of Columbia · Apr 20, 2020
Johnson v. Sallie Mae, Inc. (In re Johnson)
D. Kansas · Dec 4, 2017
Barna v. Haas (In Re Haas)
S.D. Ohio · Mar 14, 2003

Parentheticals

stating that bankruptcy court did not err in its conclusion that expenses "for cell phones and martial arts training were unnecessary”
Johnson v. Sallie Mae, Inc. (In re Johnson)
“A judge’s duty to hear cases is not so ephemeral that it dissipates at the first sight of any potential bias or partiality toward one of the litigants.”
Barna v. Haas (In Re Haas)