Loading…

Wright v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Wright v. State

2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12879 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 4, 2009

Full text

Zachary WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

PER CURIAM. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. WOLF, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Wolf, Padovano, Thomas
Cluster ID: 1561964

Citations

2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12879
18 So. 3d 1129
2009 WL 2836495

Cited by

State v. Spriggins
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 2014

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service