Loading…

Rice v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Rice v. State

2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17286 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 16, 2009

Full text

Christopher M. RICE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

PER CURIAM. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. HAWKES, C.J., BARFIELD and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Hawkes, Barfield, Clark
Cluster ID: 1613373

Citations

2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17286
23 So. 3d 192
2009 WL 3807146

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service