Full text
Miguel MONTOYA, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee

Loading…
Opinion
1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 91 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 20, 1995
Full text
Miguel MONTOYA, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
Cited by
Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco) · Mar 23, 2020
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Jan 15, 2014
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Dec 6, 2013
Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist. · Mar 15, 2012
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Dec 13, 2011
Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso) · Nov 4, 2009
Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler) · Oct 25, 2006
Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 2006
Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth) · Apr 6, 2006
Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso) · May 31, 2005
Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston) · Jan 30, 2003
Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 6, 2000
Parentheticals
concluding that the mouth includes the tongue
“When an indictment facially alleges a complete offense, the State is bound by the theory alleged in the indictment, as is the reviewing court in its sufficiency analysis.”