Loading…

Clark v. SIEGWORTH — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Clark v. SIEGWORTH

759 N.W.2d 3 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Oct 1, 2008

Full text

Clark v. SIEGWORTH

759 N.W.2d 3 (2008) CLARK v. SIEGWORTH. No. 07-1264. Court of Appeals of Iowa. October 1, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed as Modified.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 1782858

Citations

759 N.W.2d 3
2008 WL 4530619

Cited by

Dorchester Reserve, A Limited Company v. Roger D. Hammel
Court of Appeals of Iowa · Apr 14, 2021

Parentheticals

finding “that while neither the presence nor the three-inch height of the speed bump unreasonably interferes with the [plaintiff’s] ability to use the easement for its intended purpose, the location of the speed bump does”
Dorchester Reserve, A Limited Company v. Roger D. Hammel

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service